Student Solution


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

1.6 - Discussion

1.6 - Discussion

Q Discuss This is the follow-up to Applying Legal Concepts Part 1 and Part 2. In this activity: 1. Pick one of the three mini-case study solutions from Part 2. 2. Tell us the legal concepts applicable to the case and discuss why you believe your answers are correct using the terminology and any cases you found that support your opinion. 3. Explain why there may be more than one applicable Legal Concept in each Case Study and how you arrived at those answers (for instance, pick out a sentence or two from the case study that led you to that decision.) 4. Be sure to reply to at least two of your classmates for full credit. Remember, this is your first exercise in applying legal concepts. It is not unusual for one's first response to be different from the actual answer. The important thing is to go back and identify what it is in the case that makes a legal concept applicable to that case. In your initial post, make sure that you clearly identify the particular case and the particular legal concept you thought applied. Refer to 1.5 - Assignment: Applying Legal Concepts Part 2 to remind you of the details of the cases. After your initial post, reply to two of your peers' initial posts. Info: Please have your initial post made by the 4th day of the module. This will give you ample time to complete your replies as well as give your peers ample time to reply to you. You will be graded on your initial responses and replies. View the Discussion Rubric. (Please read these instructions for information on accessing the discussion rubric. Links to an external site.) It will help you in creating effective posts. Also, view the Discussion Postings Page for further suggestions on successful discussion postings.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Legal concepts that are applicable to Case No. 1 is “Discovery and Right to sue”. In this case study, XYA Corporation is researching that do they have the authorization to sue ZZZ Inc. based on ZZZ's development of widgets using parts created by their organization.. Until then, the Federal Court is being asked to streamline the investigation so an order could be imposed on the widget to prohibit future development of this same widget whilst ironing out all the information. That is why XYA requested the Federal Court to permit them to verify the authenticity of the specifics of the official gadgets blueprint so that they might investigate it even more deeply to see if they actually have all the right to prosecute.